New Delhi, Aug 22, 2025:
The Supreme Court has raised significant observations while hearing a case involving a married couple in conflict. During the proceedings, the bench questioned the very purpose of marriage if both partners wish to live entirely independent lives.
The court noted, “If two individuals desire to live as they please without accommodating each other, why marry at all?” This strong remark has sparked a fresh debate on marital responsibilities and individual freedom within marriage.
Marriage Is Not Just About Personal Freedom
The bench pointed out that marriage is traditionally seen as a partnership built on mutual respect, adjustment, and shared responsibilities. While individual freedom is important, complete independence often clashes with the essence of marital commitment.
The judges highlighted that when couples voluntarily enter into marriage, they also accept responsibilities toward each other and, in many cases, toward children. Therefore, seeking total independence within marriage raises questions about its foundation.
Children’s Welfare Above Disputes
In this particular case, the court stressed that parents must prioritize their children’s welfare over personal disputes. The bench observed that despite differences, parents should strive to live together harmoniously, ensuring a stable environment for their children’s growth.
The court suggested that setting aside ego and disagreements is crucial for maintaining family unity. “Children should not suffer because of parental conflicts,” the bench emphasized.
A Larger Social Question
This observation by the Supreme Court has opened a broader social discussion: Should individuals who wish to live entirely on their own terms choose not to marry? Experts believe the judgment underlines the balance between personal liberty and marital duties.
Legal scholars say the ruling reiterates the importance of marriage as a social institution in India, where family values are deeply rooted. At the same time, it acknowledges the need for harmony between personal independence and collective responsibility.
Key Highlights:
- Supreme Court questioned the purpose of marriage if couples demand complete independence.
- Judges stressed that marriage requires adjustment, responsibility, and compromise.
- Welfare of children must take precedence over marital disputes.
- The ruling sparks debate on balancing individual freedom and family responsibilities.