New Delhi, July 24, 2025 –
The Supreme Court of India made a strong observation today, asserting that its decisions are not swayed by any media narratives. The remark came in response to Solicitor General *Tushar Mehta’s claim that certain *media stories were negatively targeting the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and influencing public perception.
A bench comprising SG Tushar Mehta, Justice BR Gavai, and Justice KV Chandran was hearing a suo motu case related to the ED issuing summons to lawyers based on the legal advice they had given to clients. The Court has taken serious note of this practice, which it said could have grave implications on the sanctity of legal counsel and client confidentiality.
Media Reports Trigger Reaction from the Bench
As the hearing began, CJI BR Gavai noted that he was “shocked” after reading articles published on LiveLaw and Bar & Bench, which highlighted how the ED was allegedly summoning senior advocates for offering legal opinions to clients.
In a firm tone, the Court said,
“You cannot argue that media reports are influencing our decisions. Our judgments are based solely on law and facts.”
Solicitor General Clarifies Union’s Stand
SG Tushar Mehta clarified that the Union Government is not taking an adversarial stance in the matter. However, he raised concerns over what he called a “misleading narrative” being constructed by a section of the media targeting investigative agencies like the ED.
The Court reiterated its commitment to independent adjudication and judicial integrity, emphasizing that it would not allow external narratives—whether political or media-driven—to interfere in the delivery of justice.
Background of the Case
This suo motu case was initiated by the Supreme Court to address growing concerns that investigative bodies like the ED were overstepping by issuing summons to lawyers for simply giving legal opinions. The move has sparked widespread debate among legal professionals and civil rights advocates.
The matter is likely to set a precedent regarding how legal advice is treated in the eyes of investigative agencies, and whether lawyers can be held liable for opinions rendered to their clients.
Key Highlights:
- Supreme Court says its judgments are not influenced by media reports.
- Response came after SG Mehta flagged biased coverage against ED.
- CJI expressed shock after reading articles in LiveLaw and Bar & Bench.
- Suo motu case pertains to ED summoning lawyers for offering legal advice.
- Court reaffirms judicial independence and warns against media interference.